“Lecture”, the dirtiest word in education right now. It is
a teaching technique that is viewed as antiquated, not hands on, and boring.
Teachers are instructed to stand on their heads, spin in circles, create
exploding volcanoes, and do anything other than perform a dreaded lecture
because some believe that students need to experience the content to understand
it. I mean you can't really argue with statistics, a recent "2014
study showed that test
scores in science and math courses improved after professors replaced lecture
time with “active learning” methods like group work" (Worthen, 2015). What
a novel idea; group work! Unfortunately, the only thing that this statistic
does is provide evidence for
"active learning"; it does not discredit the old school lecture. While, I have sat through many a lecture that could be described
as a snooze fest at best, I still rally behind the oldie but goodie
technique.
The lecture simply can't be beat. It informs students and
then allows them, "to process ideas and think deeply about what they just
heard or saw" (Kovalskys, 2015). However, you do have to be very careful
because lectures can quickly take a turn from informative and interesting to
drooling and drowsy if you don't follow a few rules. For example, Kovalskys
describes a new breed of lecture-the interactive lecture- as a traditional
lecture style intertwined with active learning experiences such as formative
assessments, checks for understandings, and student-generated products. (2015)
As a teacher we are
expected to constantly keep things moving, get the students motivated, and
pique their interest in any content whether it be multi-step equations or subject-verb
agreement. One way to do this is to teach them what each thing is first by
lecturing, but remember to keep it brief. Researchers suggest that lectures
should be 15 minutes or less, but there is little evidence that supports this
claim. Rather many students go through bouts of paying attention and not about
every 4-5 minutes. (Briggs, 2014) Ultimately what we can gather from the
attention span theories is that we should mix it up. We should offer
opportunities that engage “student
attention during a segment and refreshing attention immediately after a
segment.” (Briggs, 2014). A beautiful way to weave the active learning method
and lecture learning method together is to provide an engaging lecture with
interactive notes for about 8-10 minutes and then ask a probing question that
allows students to engage with the content that was just taught. In addition,
to add an ending to a segment you can provide students with practice to try
their hand at implementing the content you just taught. This schedule will help
teachers present the necessary information so students learn the information
correctly, but it also keeps students engaged and using what was just taught.
Lastly,
it is imperative that as teachers we understand the appropriate use of prosody
and intonation. If you choose to use a lecture style you are choosing to be on
stage. As educators we are on stage for about 90% of our day and we need to
convey the message that whatever we are teaching excites us. Students are like
animals and can detect when something is off. Your attitude toward the content
will set the mood for the entire class period. Lectures are not antiquated and
outdated they are functional and necessary. They provide instant information so
students that struggle don’t have to worry if they discovered the “right”
answers through inquiry based learning and students that are not confident can
always be reassured that they have the correct information.
Lectures
provide the perfect template to give information. Many times it is imperative
for students with learning disabilities to get the right information and
practice using the right information. We are so wrapped up in the idea of discovery
based learning, but we don’t take in to account what implications it might have
if a student practices the incorrect way without being told otherwise. We can immediately
remove that possibility by providing short, engaging lectures that end with a
culminating activity or application activity for students. As teachers we have to
remind ourselves that reinventing the wheel is not necessary. Sometimes the old
ways are the best ways and we can just add some new ideas to them. So get out
there and lecture away!
Works Cited
Briggs, S. (2014, June 28). The Science of Attention: How To
Capture And Hold The Attention of Easily Distracted Students - InformED.
Retrieved July 10, 2016, from
http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/30-tricks-for-capturing-students-attention/
Kovalskys, G. (2015, July 31). Why the Best Teachers Won't
Ditch the Lecture (EdSurge News). Retrieved July 10, 2016, from
https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-07-31-why-the-best-teachers-won-t-ditch-the-lecture
Worthen, M. (2015, October 17). Lecture Me. Really.
Retrieved July 10, 2016, from
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/18/opinion/sunday/lecture-me-really.html?_r=0
Rebecca,
ReplyDeleteYou have a great post about lecturing. For your stance, you are pro lecturing. I tend to feel the opposite of you when it comes to lectures, but I do think you make some valid points for why you say go ahead and lecture. The idea of interactive notes allows the students to stay engaged while still being part of the lecture. If there are no "interactive notes" then of course the lecture will be a snooze fest. Another point is the attitude. As a teacher, you need to be EXCITED about the material you teach. I have had my share of teachers who are one note. What fun is it to have a class going on for 60 minutes with a teacher who does not get excited about weather. It dragged. If a teacher puts a smile on, shows excitement...then we will have a successful outcome when it comes to lecturing.
By Kevin Edwards
DeleteYou have done a good job connecting this course content to sharing your in-depth thoughts on lecturing! I particularly like that you have provided several solutions in your post to inform your audience. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete